Date: Mon, 29 May 2000 21:55:40 -0700 From: Doug Barton <DougB@gorean.org> To: Matt Heckaman <matt@ARPA.MAIL.NET> Cc: Kris Kennaway <kris@FreeBSD.org>, Kenneth W Cochran <kwc@world.std.com>, freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: 4.0-stable, OpenSSH v1 & v2 Message-ID: <393349CC.66070C95@gorean.org> References: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0005292115580.56249-100000@epsilon.lucida.qc.ca>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Matt Heckaman wrote:
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On Mon, 29 May 2000, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> [...]
> : > Is it reasonable to assume that OpenSSH v2 will (should)
> : > disappear from ports when/if it goes to the main source tree?
> :
> : Once we stop supporting FreeBSD 3.x in ports..
>
> To be honest, do we WANT to stop supporting it in the ports?
Think about that for a minute. Do we still want to support FreeBSD
2.1.x in the ports? Assuming the answer is no, all Kris is saying is
that when we stop supporting 3.x, the openss[hl] ports will disappear.
Please don't overreact. :)
Doug
--
"Live free or die"
- State motto of my ancestral homeland, New Hampshire
Do YOU Yahoo!?
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?393349CC.66070C95>