Date: Thu, 3 Aug 2006 10:02:28 +0300 From: Ruslan Ermilov <ru@freebsd.org> To: Antony Mawer <fbsd-net@mawer.org> Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Plans to port OpenBSD trunk(4)? Message-ID: <20060803070228.GD87627@freebsd.org.ua> In-Reply-To: <44D18EAF.1010907@mawer.org> References: <44D18EAF.1010907@mawer.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
[-- Attachment #1 --] On Thu, Aug 03, 2006 at 03:50:39PM +1000, Antony Mawer wrote: > Hi list, > > Is there any interest or plans underway to port the trunk(4) feature > from OpenBSD? OpenBSD's trunk(4) appears to be exactly what I'm looking > for, but there doesn't appear to be anything I can find on a port to > FreeBSD. > > http://www.openbsd.org/cgi-bin/man.cgi?query=trunk&sektion=4 > > I've been tasked with setting up a system that will have 2x Intel > Pro/1000 network adapters linked to an HP ProCurve 5300XL modular switch. > > I stumbled across ng_fec(4), but it refers explicitly to Cisco Fast > EtherChannel; some information suggests that this is supported by the HP > switch... would using Netgraph with ng_fec achieve the same end result? > Has anyone successfully used it as such? > ng_one2many(4) can do it; search for "bonding" in the FreeBSD mail archives for details. Cheers, -- Ruslan Ermilov ru@FreeBSD.org FreeBSD committer [-- Attachment #2 --] -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFE0Z+EqRfpzJluFF4RAld0AJ9mcQiyLew/1StGhO81W7KQFbeXkQCfdsAX PwQxfVRzOqEAv2k1AyAIla8= =VrUj -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20060803070228.GD87627>