Date: Thu, 3 Aug 2006 10:02:28 +0300 From: Ruslan Ermilov <ru@freebsd.org> To: Antony Mawer <fbsd-net@mawer.org> Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Plans to port OpenBSD trunk(4)? Message-ID: <20060803070228.GD87627@freebsd.org.ua> In-Reply-To: <44D18EAF.1010907@mawer.org> References: <44D18EAF.1010907@mawer.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--NtwzykIc2mflq5ck Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, Aug 03, 2006 at 03:50:39PM +1000, Antony Mawer wrote: > Hi list, >=20 > Is there any interest or plans underway to port the trunk(4) feature=20 > from OpenBSD? OpenBSD's trunk(4) appears to be exactly what I'm looking= =20 > for, but there doesn't appear to be anything I can find on a port to=20 > FreeBSD. >=20 > http://www.openbsd.org/cgi-bin/man.cgi?query=3Dtrunk&sektion=3D4 >=20 > I've been tasked with setting up a system that will have 2x Intel=20 > Pro/1000 network adapters linked to an HP ProCurve 5300XL modular switch. >=20 > I stumbled across ng_fec(4), but it refers explicitly to Cisco Fast=20 > EtherChannel; some information suggests that this is supported by the HP= =20 > switch... would using Netgraph with ng_fec achieve the same end result?= =20 > Has anyone successfully used it as such? >=20 ng_one2many(4) can do it; search for "bonding" in the FreeBSD mail archives for details. Cheers, --=20 Ruslan Ermilov ru@FreeBSD.org FreeBSD committer --NtwzykIc2mflq5ck Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFE0Z+EqRfpzJluFF4RAld0AJ9mcQiyLew/1StGhO81W7KQFbeXkQCfdsAX PwQxfVRzOqEAv2k1AyAIla8= =VrUj -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --NtwzykIc2mflq5ck--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20060803070228.GD87627>