Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 01 May 2000 16:43:10 -0700
From:      David Greenman <dg@root.com>
To:        chad@DCFinc.com
Cc:        blk@skynet.be (Brad Knowles), parag@cgt.com, msmith@FreeBSD.ORG, freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: How good is AMI MegaRAID support? 
Message-ID:  <200005012343.QAA28681@implode.root.com>
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Mon, 01 May 2000 16:00:59 PDT." <200005012300.QAA18195@freeway.dcfinc.com> 

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>> 	How fast is fast enough?  Do you need a disk subsystem that can 
>> handle bursts of ~2500 USENET news history database lookups per 
>> second?  What would it take to get to that level?  Do you need to see 
>> rawio read performance (average tranfer size of one sector w/ 64 
>> simultaneous processes) of around 5,000 read operations per second? 
>
>We're running quite a bit more than 5,000 iops/sec on the EMC Symmetrix 
>box that's replacing the A-3500s.
>
>Just depends on what it is you need done.

   TeraSolutions' RAID systems (TSR-2200) as used on ftp.freesoftware.com are
capable of >9,000 IOPS.
   There are other issues to consider when thinking about software RAID-5. The
most important of these is the (lack of) non-volatile write-back cache.

-DG

David Greenman
Co-founder/Principal Architect, The FreeBSD Project - http://www.freebsd.org
Creator of high-performance Internet servers - http://www.terasolutions.com
Pave the road of life with opportunities.


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200005012343.QAA28681>