Date: Thu, 30 Mar 2006 12:28:01 -0800 From: Michael DeMan <michael@staff.openaccess.org> To: Bart Van Kerckhove <bart@it-ss.be> Cc: "freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org" <freebsd-net@freebsd.org>, Andre Oppermann <andre@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: OT - Quagga/CARP Message-ID: <1BCB15D2-287E-4CA7-B0BE-4CAA42FFEEFF@staff.openaccess.org> In-Reply-To: <003701c65355$4abb9210$020b000a@bartwrkstxp> References: <C935A1DF-4F65-4D5A-991B-B8A6C7E7DE24@staff.openaccess.org><014e01c64928$6107abd0$020b000a@bartwrkstxp> <20060316193740.GE11850@spc.org> <003701c64941$ac548540$020b000a@bartwrkstxp> <4419DDC3.67339796@freebsd.org> <003701c65355$4abb9210$020b000a@bartwrkstxp>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Yes, Any ideas anywhere? I'm not a BSD kernel guru, but from the other people that responded it seems that the issue is not allowing userland processes to update the routing table with the same subnet if there is a route for that subnet in the UNIX kernel already. You can force the local interface to be in the same subnet with 'ifconfig', but you cannot do it via 'ip adddress' in quagga. Michael F. DeMan Director of Technology OpenAccess Network Services Bellingham, WA 98225 michael@staff.openaccess.org 360-647-0785 On Mar 29, 2006, at 9:22 AM, Bart Van Kerckhove wrote: > Andre Oppermann <andre@freebsd.org> wrote: > <snipped posts> >> >> Lets discuss this. Claudio (@openbsd.org and my employee) have a >> couple of ideas on how to do this the best way. > > Andre, do you have any further updates/insights to share on this > topic? > > With kind regards, > > Bart Van Kerckhove > bart@it-ss.be > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1BCB15D2-287E-4CA7-B0BE-4CAA42FFEEFF>