Date: Sun, 22 Jul 2007 00:18:29 +0200 From: "Timur I. Bakeyev" <timur@com.bat.ru> To: Joe Marcus Clarke <marcus@marcuscom.com> Cc: Pascal Hofstee <caelian@gmail.com>, current <current@freebsd.org>, "Boris S." <bst2006@dva.dyndns.org>, Brian Donnell <bdonnell@gmail.com> Subject: Re: ZFS vs Samba Debugging Results ... Need Help. Message-ID: <20070721221828.GB1874@com.bat.ru> In-Reply-To: <1183699446.55166.62.camel@shumai.marcuscom.com> References: <d8a0b7620707031359wc178fdfocf2387820fcacbf5@mail.gmail.com> <46633B27.50601@dva.dyndns.org> <1c5c32890707031732s195a97c3vd29fb46323f28fae@mail.gmail.com> <46644820.6020609@dva.dyndns.org> <1c5c32890707041057x75712a20vef9800a7ddef7a6a@mail.gmail.com> <1183674495.75595.14.camel@worf> <1c5c32890707051739t6621e2d4ude73ce5d096ea72e@mail.gmail.com> <1183698637.55166.58.camel@shumai.marcuscom.com> <1c5c32890707052219p61c4abd4s7be4dd7c51a8246e@mail.gmail.com> <1183699446.55166.62.camel@shumai.marcuscom.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--M38YqGLZlgb6RLPS Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="NU0Ex4SbNnrxsi6C" Content-Disposition: inline --NU0Ex4SbNnrxsi6C Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi all! On Fri, Jul 06, 2007 at 01:24:06AM -0400, Joe Marcus Clarke wrote: >=20 > The behavior of telldir/closedir on FreeBSD is the same as when these > replacement functions were written (i.e. the unused telldir() linked > list nodes need to be freed in closedir()). I'm not certain about the > rmdir issue to which the comments also refer. >=20 > Julian's recent post from the Samba people indicates they still think > the code is needed. Here I attach a tarball with the simple test written by Andrew Tridgell (Makefile I drafted myself, original was lost, so blame me if any) which somehow proves, that we do have some problems with the consistency of telldir/seekdir behaviour in FreeBD. So, please run this tests against ZFS and whichever else you want FS and check, does the problem still exists and, maybe - how it can be solved in a better and portable way. =46rom my side I can only confirm it's still a problem on FreeBSD-STABLE on UFS2. With regards, Timur Bakeyev. --NU0Ex4SbNnrxsi6C-- --M38YqGLZlgb6RLPS Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFGooY0C/BkEmC6H0cRAgHpAKDQrjMP8/Fp4Nidfloxfrof3PsCcwCfbVBA Bv8kkXMAq5L8VGEWAz0RZ5k= =xC7U -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --M38YqGLZlgb6RLPS--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20070721221828.GB1874>