Date: Fri, 15 Oct 2004 12:23:28 +0100 From: Chris Howells <howells@kde.org> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD and poor ata performance Message-ID: <200410151223.33355.howells@kde.org> In-Reply-To: <416F90E6.10108@ng.fadesa.es> References: <416EB6B1.6060405@ng.fadesa.es> <416F849F.8020508@solid-state-logic.com> <416F90E6.10108@ng.fadesa.es>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
[-- Attachment #1 --] On Friday 15 October 2004 09:57, fandino wrote: > I'm out of ideas, It doesn't matter if I use other PC or hard disks, > performance > sucks compared to Linux :-( OK, so you came to conclusion that "performance sucks" based on the the theoretical throughput figures using dd and /dev/zero? Why don't you try measuring real world performace, with real files, not somethig which is more than likely completely meaningless when two operating systems cache file system operations in different ways. -- Cheers, Chris Howells -- chris@chrishowells.co.uk, howells@kde.org Web: http://chrishowells.co.uk, PGP ID: 0x33795A2C KDE/Qt/C++/PHP Developer: http://www.kde.org [-- Attachment #2 --] -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBBb7M1F8Iu1zN5WiwRArjcAJ9Ey2hSNeIYjQX92O6FKHfiwMDJ5wCcDO1L z0xgVWItfht/iAvtjtRbGRk= =QGzs -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----help
Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200410151223.33355.howells>