Date: Wed, 22 May 2019 17:59:16 +0300 From: Daniel Braniss <danny@cs.huji.ac.il> To: Konstantin Belousov <kostikbel@gmail.com> Cc: Enji Cooper <yaneurabeya@gmail.com>, hackers@freebsd.org, "Andrey V. Elsukov" <bu7cher@yandex.ru> Subject: Re: ERR#78 'function not implemented' Message-ID: <053B6218-7AEA-4845-B6EA-030E1F9C6FEB@cs.huji.ac.il> In-Reply-To: <20190522134841.GZ2748@kib.kiev.ua> References: <6B0A65C2-5F53-47B3-8159-0AEA3E0C37C4@cs.huji.ac.il> <87ede120-b533-302d-6ffb-82fd735dce21@yandex.ru> <7C0C64B8-B2A4-4CE8-9A1A-9394A9E1550A@cs.huji.ac.il> <1419BF6D-9BF3-454B-A9BB-E7CB50D4B540@gmail.com> <20190522134841.GZ2748@kib.kiev.ua>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
> On 22 May 2019, at 16:48, Konstantin Belousov <kostikbel@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Wed, May 22, 2019 at 06:16:03AM -0700, Enji Cooper wrote: >> >>> On May 22, 2019, at 05:57, Daniel Braniss <danny@cs.huji.ac.il> wrote: >>> >>>> On 22 May 2019, at 11:38, Andrey V. Elsukov <bu7cher@yandex.ru> wrote: >>>> >>>> On 21.05.2019 19:03, Daniel Braniss wrote: >>>>> Hi, >>>>> Im using a freebsd-stable-11.1-STABLE to cross compile for arm, I have been doing it for some time >>>>> without any issues, but today I decided to try out release.sh and it failes. >>>>> I have run the ‘bad’ command: >>>> >>>>> -- UNKNOWN FreeBSD ELF64 SYSCALL 568 -- >>>>> #568() ERR#78 'Function not implemented' >>>>> SIGNAL 12 (SIGSYS) code=SI_KERNEL >>>>> process killed, signal = 12 (core dumped) >>>> >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> Your kernel is too old to be able run this binary. Syscall 568 is >>>> funlinkat(2), it was introduced in r345982. >>>> >>>> https://svnweb.freebsd.org/base?view=revision&revision=345982 >>>> >>> hi, >>> thanks, so that raises a new question: >>> Q: to use release.sh one needs to be running the latest current? >> >> In theory, liblegacy and ITOOLS should be taking care of some of this. A binary is being run from the install which should be run from the system. >> > liblegacy only relevant when your target is the old host system. It cannot > help with running binary built on newer system. > >> That being said, you should be running a more recent release of 11.x or stable/11. > No. > > You cannot run 12 binaries on 11 at all (practically any binary would fail), > and you cannot run some HEAD binaries on 12. at the moment, my workaround is to change the mounts (so far in 2 places) to not do a chroot, thus using the system’s mount. (I still have not succeeded in crating an sd image, it just takes too long :-) Q: why shouldn’t this be the default? and now I run away and hide cheers, dannyhelp
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?053B6218-7AEA-4845-B6EA-030E1F9C6FEB>