Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 18 Dec 2010 18:34:16 +0600
From:      Eugene Grosbein <egrosbein@rdtc.ru>
To:        syrinx@freebsd.org
Cc:        Kostik Belousov <kostikbel@gmail.com>, freebsd-net@freebsd.org, Mikolaj Golub <to.my.trociny@gmail.com>
Subject:   Re: bsnmp/snmpmod.h: #include <sys/queue.h> is missed
Message-ID:  <4D0CAA48.7000901@rdtc.ru>
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTimBd74%2B0ycDN9p8A4Lt5myq8po7uXCZua1PGdTS@mail.gmail.com>
References:  <86wrn7gxvd.fsf@kopusha.home.net>	<20101218110358.GY33073@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua> <AANLkTimBd74%2B0ycDN9p8A4Lt5myq8po7uXCZua1PGdTS@mail.gmail.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 18.12.2010 18:01, Shteryana Shopova wrote:

>>> bsnmp/snmpmod.h uses SLIST but does not includes <sys/queue.h>. This breaks
>>> net-mgmt/bsnmp-ucd port (ports/153153).
>>>
>>> Could somebody look at the attached patch?
>>
>> <sys/types.h>, as well as <sys/param.h> should be included before
>> other headers.
>>
> 
> And the explicit includes of those files should be removed from the
> sources of the bsnmpd(1) modules, I think. I will put this in SVN
> along with a couple of other patches I have for bsnmp in my queue.
> Sorry for not being able to reply sooner after this problem was
> reported. Also, the bsnmptools port should be marked as obsolete as
> the tools are now in head.

I don't think that a port should be marked obsoled due to changes in head.
People tend to use releases or STABLE. For now, ports tree support RELENG_7
and RELENG_8, so we should keep POLA until bsnmptool backported to branches
and releases with bsnmptool are out.

Eugene Grosbein



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4D0CAA48.7000901>