Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2005 19:07:35 +0100 From: Bernd Walter <ticso@cicely12.cicely.de> To: John Baldwin <jhb@freebsd.org> Cc: ticso@cicely.de, freebsd-alpha@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Panic in tulip_txprobe Message-ID: <20051221180734.GB83393@cicely12.cicely.de> In-Reply-To: <200512211021.13384.jhb@freebsd.org> References: <20051221020726.GV83393@cicely12.cicely.de> <200512211021.13384.jhb@freebsd.org>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
On Wed, Dec 21, 2005 at 10:21:12AM -0500, John Baldwin wrote: > This is more fallout from Ruslan's IF_LLADDR changes. The simplest fix would > be to change tulip_txprobe() to use sc->tulip_enaddr rather than IF_LLADDR > prior to the call to ether_ifattach(). Hmmm, tulip_addr_filter() can also be > called from tulip_init_locked() via tulip_linkup() via tulip_media_poll() as > well. *sigh* I hate to call ether_ifattach() before the chip is actually > known to be in a working state though which is the other alternative. You > can try this patch which uses sc->tulip_enaddr early on: It's booting with your patch. If you need a functional test let me know - so far the card is just in, because it's a combo card, network connection is done using an fxp card. -- B.Walter BWCT http://www.bwct.de bernd@bwct.de info@bwct.dehelp
Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20051221180734.GB83393>