Date: Sun, 28 Oct 2012 15:30:53 -0700 From: Rui Paulo <rpaulo@felyko.com> To: Andre Oppermann <andre@FreeBSD.org> Cc: svn-src-head@freebsd.org, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, src-committers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r242266 - head/sys/netinet Message-ID: <3E1E3E49-CB09-474B-878E-45962C74685F@felyko.com> In-Reply-To: <508DB0C6.5050902@freebsd.org> References: <201210281947.q9SJlku2085767@svn.freebsd.org> <4532DEB1-4EFE-4E4B-BE1F-A99FFC58DBA3@felyko.com> <508DA4B3.4080002@freebsd.org> <8CE1596C-A1E2-49BA-985D-D4D6C891C544@felyko.com> <508DB0C6.5050902@freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 28 Oct 2012, at 15:25, Andre Oppermann <andre@FreeBSD.org> wrote: > That's always the case. Reality is that the majority of links these > days is very fast compared to twenty years ago. We can afford to be > a bit more aggressive here. Otherwise taking your point to the = extreme > would mean that IW can only ever be 1 MSS. Not really. My point was that raising the initial window to overcome = deficiencies somewhere else is the wrong approach. Regards, -- Rui Paulo
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3E1E3E49-CB09-474B-878E-45962C74685F>