Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 11 Sep 1997 10:43:43 +0400 (MSD)
From:      =?KOI8-R?B?4c7E0sXKIP7F0s7P1w==?= <ache@nagual.pp.ru>
To:        Bruce Evans <bde@zeta.org.au>
Cc:        nnd@itfs.nsk.su, current@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: PPP - why set CLOCAL for server ('-direct' mode) ?
Message-ID:  <Pine.BSF.3.96.970911104119.26451B-100000@lsd.relcom.eu.net>
In-Reply-To: <199709110631.QAA29277@godzilla.zeta.org.au>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, 11 Sep 1997, Bruce Evans wrote:

> Presumably it needs to monitor carrier even for direct mode.  Isn't the

I don't think so. It is upper level control function, f.e. /etc/rc.serial

> only difference for direct mode that getty instead of ppp opens the port?

ppp already don't set speed for direct port confirming my idea about upper
level controlling.

-- 
Andrey A. Chernov
<ache@null.net>
http://www.nagual.pp.ru/~ache/




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.3.96.970911104119.26451B-100000>