Date: Wed, 14 Feb 1996 21:49:57 -0800 From: Paul Traina <pst@shockwave.com> To: invalid opcode <coredump@nervosa.com> Cc: FreeBSD-current <current@FreeBSD.org> Subject: Re: /usr/local/libexec vs /usr/local/sbin Message-ID: <199602150549.VAA05414@precipice.shockwave.com> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Wed, 14 Feb 1996 17:49:31 PST." <Pine.BSF.3.91.960214174739.23733A-100000@nervosa.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Yes, you're absolutely correct, UNLESS they are standalone daemons, in which case, sbin is correct (e.g. sendmail, inetd) From: invalid opcode <coredump@nervosa.com> Subject: /usr/local/libexec vs /usr/local/sbin Shouldn't local daemon's, i.e. identd, imapd, go into /usr/local/libexec rather than /usr/local/sbin? Also, shouldn't local man pages go into /usr/local/share/man? I'm just trying to establish some consistency. Chris Layne, coredump@nervosa.com.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199602150549.VAA05414>