Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2004 12:13:36 +0100 From: "Poul-Henning Kamp" <phk@phk.freebsd.dk> To: Alexander Leidinger <Alexander@Leidinger.net> Cc: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Future of RAIDFrame and Vinum (was: Future of RAIDFrame) Message-ID: <9729.1073819616@critter.freebsd.dk> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Sun, 11 Jan 2004 12:08:24 %2B0100." <20040111120824.00cb6314@Magellan.Leidinger.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message <20040111120824.00cb6314@Magellan.Leidinger.net>, Alexander Leidinge r writes: >I'm a little bit confused. I've read Pouls mail as an suggestion to >remove vinum from -current and let people modify it in the perforce >repository. If I got this wrong, please tell me and everything is fine, >but if I got it right, do you (Greg) agree to remove it from -current? My proposal is to do just that with both vinum and raidframe until one or possibly both are up to full strength again. -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 phk@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?9729.1073819616>