Date: Sat, 05 Oct 2002 19:13:42 -0700 From: Peter Wemm <peter@wemm.org> To: Andrew Gallatin <gallatin@cs.duke.edu> Cc: Daniel Eischen <eischen@pcnet1.pcnet.com>, "Brian F. Feldman" <green@FreeBSD.ORG>, German Tischler <tanis@gaspode.franken.de>, freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG, Daniel Eischen <deischen@FreeBSD.ORG>, Jonathan Mini <mini@FreeBSD.ORG> Subject: Re: SSE Message-ID: <20021006021342.9C2022A88D@canning.wemm.org> In-Reply-To: <15775.21658.385069.581909@grasshopper.cs.duke.edu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Andrew Gallatin wrote:
>
> Daniel Eischen writes:
> > > > On further reflection, this DEFINITELY has to do with the work done on
> > > > npx(4)/signals/etc. in the past week. I _must_ be getting a GPF becau
se the
> > > > fpu state that it's attempting to restore is corrupt (i.e.: the contro
l word
> > > > is incorrect), so something is not being initialized somewhere that it
used
> > > > to be, or is being initialized incorrectly.
> > >
> > > The last few commits to machdep.c bother me, rev 1.539 in particular.
> > >
> > > If you are in a position to be able to quickly test it, it would be grea
t
> > > to know if backing out the last few changes fixes this, and which change
in
> > > particular.
> >
> > There have been two commits since 1.539; what version of machdep.c
> > is being used?
>
> 1.539 works. 1.540 crashes. The failure mode is:
My apologies, I meant 1.540 (really :-).
I suspect it might be time to give up and do the alternative sigtrap and
sigreturn.
Cheers,
-Peter
--
Peter Wemm - peter@wemm.org; peter@FreeBSD.org; peter@yahoo-inc.com
"All of this is for nothing if we don't go to the stars" - JMS/B5
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20021006021342.9C2022A88D>