Date: Mon, 21 Oct 1996 19:59:00 +0200 From: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@critter.tfs.com> To: michael butler <imb@scgt.oz.au> Cc: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ISDN code removal, final warning. Message-ID: <3364.845920740@critter.tfs.com> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Tue, 22 Oct 1996 03:46:28 %2B1000." <199610211746.DAA29279@asstdc.scgt.oz.au>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message <199610211746.DAA29279@asstdc.scgt.oz.au>, michael butler writes: >Poul-Henning Kamp writes: > >> I agree that putting all the Q931 in userland is a good idea, if nothing >> else, then for the developers of it. > >First up, I confess to not knowing much about ISDN at this level so my >question is likely naive at best .. does this layer have anything to do with >selecting the switch type ? The reason I ask is that we have a "standard" >(aka TS-013) which is almost totally unknown outside of Oz .. Yeah, Q.931 is the protocol that runs the show. As all other protocols from CCITT (now ITU-T) it has options by the boatloads and is so heavy that you reserve 128kbit/sec on a 2048kbut/sec circuit for it. -- Poul-Henning Kamp | phk@FreeBSD.ORG FreeBSD Core-team. http://www.freebsd.org/~phk | phk@login.dknet.dk Private mailbox. whois: [PHK] | phk@ref.tfs.com TRW Financial Systems, Inc. Future will arrive by its own means, progress not so.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3364.845920740>