Date: Thu, 4 Dec 2003 18:45:32 +0200 From: Ruslan Ermilov <ru@freebsd.org> To: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: NOCLEAN Message-ID: <20031204164532.GD15528@FreeBSD.org.ua> In-Reply-To: <20031204163929.GB85960@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <3FCF60CB.3090103@mail.ru> <20031204163929.GB85960@xor.obsecurity.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--oj4kGyHlBMXGt3Le Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, Dec 04, 2003 at 08:39:29AM -0800, Kris Kennaway wrote: > On Thu, Dec 04, 2003 at 08:28:59PM +0400, rihad wrote: > > Hi, > >=20 > > Are there any known issues about setting NOCLEAN from make.conf? >=20 > No new ones - it remains an option that you should only set if you > know what you're doing, and if you encounter problems with it you need > to remove it and do a full build. Generally NOCLEAN is only safe to > do when rebuilding, not when upgrading. >=20 That's pretty much true. We often saw when the type of the object changes from file to directory or vice versa, and that does not make a stale .depend happy at all. Also, I sometimes see problems with -DNOCLEAN upgrades in OpenSSL, I suspect there might be some missing hardcoded dependencies in its makefiles; I have not looked into it yet. Cheers, --=20 Ruslan Ermilov FreeBSD committer ru@FreeBSD.org --oj4kGyHlBMXGt3Le Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQE/z2SsUkv4P6juNwoRAuaTAJ0V5ZkPR91wf1tiwzVasxFICTYB6ACdFInA cnZwSgdikkG8a6xvDfMvrjA= =cbhZ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --oj4kGyHlBMXGt3Le--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20031204164532.GD15528>