Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2007 12:31:12 +0300 From: "Victor M. Blood" <freebsd@masm.elcom.ru> To: Darren Reed <darrenr@freebsd.org>, freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ipfilter cannot be build within because warning's are present Message-ID: <844298991.20071029123112@masm.elcom.ru> In-Reply-To: <47200F5E.9070104@freebsd.org> References: <359284519.20071018014832@masm.elcom.ru> <200710172357.18221.max@love2party.net> <6210619899.20071018020530@masm.elcom.ru> <200710180021.39250.max@love2party.net> <1564774296.20071018172432@masm.elcom.ru> <47200F5E.9070104@freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 25.10.2007, Darren Reed wrote: > Please try the attached patch. Hmm... All patches failed in /sys/contrib/ipfilter/netinet Script started on Mon Oct 29 13:25:23 2007 release# patch=07 -p4 <fr=07=08=1B[K=08=1B[K ip_fi=07l_f=07reebsd.c.=07patc= h=20 Hmm... Looks like a context diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |*** ip_fil4.1.28/ip_fil_freebsd.c Thu Sep 20 05:51:50 2007 |--- ip_fil4.1.28a/ip_fil_freebsd.c Sat Oct 20 22:29:37 2007 -------------------------- Patching file ip_fil_freebsd.c using Plan A... (Fascinating--this is really a new-style context diff but without the telltale extra asterisks on the *** line that usually indicate the new style...) Hunk #1 failed at 345. 1 out of 1 hunks failed--saving rejects to ip_fil_freebsd.c.rej done release# patch -p4 <fre=08=1B[K=08=1B[K=08=1B[K ip_po=07ol.c=07.patch=20 Hmm... Looks like a context diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |*** ip_fil4.1.28/ip_pool.c Wed Oct 10 02:45:37 2007 |--- ip_fil4.1.28a/ip_pool.c Wed Oct 24 19:59:13 2007 -------------------------- Patching file ip_pool.c using Plan A... Hunk #1 failed at 977. 1 out of 1 hunks failed--saving rejects to ip_pool.c.rej done release# patch -p4 < ip_pool.c.patch=08=1B[K=08=1B[K=08=1B[K=08=1B[K=08=1B[= K=08=1B[K=08=1B[K=08=1B[K=08=1B[K=08=1B[K=08=1B[K=08=1B[Kna=07t.c=07.=07pat= ch=20 Hmm... Looks like a context diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |*** ip_fil4.1.28/ip_nat.c Tue Oct 16 03:08:10 2007 |--- ip_fil4.1.28a/ip_nat.c Sat Oct 20 22:48:19 2007 -------------------------- Patching file ip_nat.c using Plan A... Hunk #1 failed at 187. (Fascinating--this is really a new-style context diff but without the telltale extra asterisks on the *** line that usually indicate the new style...) Hunk #2 failed at 817. Hunk #3 failed at 888. Hunk #4 failed at 1190. Hunk #5 failed at 1201. Hunk #6 failed at 1213. Hunk #7 failed at 1229. Hunk #8 failed at 1247. Hunk #9 failed at 1267. Hunk #10 failed at 1287. Hunk #11 failed at 1361. 11 out of 11 hunks failed--saving rejects to ip_nat.c.rej done release# patch -p4 < ip_nat.c.patch=08=1B[K=08=1B[K=08=1B[K=08=1B[K=08=1B[K= =08=1B[K=08=1B[K=08=1B[K=08=1B[K=08=1B[K=08=1B[Krul=07es.h=07=07.patch=20 Hmm... Looks like a context diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |*** ip_fil4.1.28/ip_state.c Tue Oct 16 02:33:23 2007 |--- ip_fil4.1.28a/ip_state.c Sat Oct 20 22:47:57 2007 -------------------------- Patching file ip_state.c using Plan A... (Fascinating--this is really a new-style context diff but without the telltale extra asterisks on the *** line that usually indicate the new style...) Hunk #1 failed at 653. Hunk #2 failed at 672. Hunk #3 failed at 683. 3 out of 3 hunks failed--saving rejects to ip_state.c.rej done release# exit exit Script done on Mon Oct 29 13:26:42 2007 --=20 With all regards, Victor M. Blood. mailto: freebsd@masm.elcom.ru FTN: 2:5024/1.95@Fidonet.org, ICQ#3567656
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?844298991.20071029123112>