Date: Sun, 28 Feb 1999 09:32:51 +0000 (GMT) From: Doug Rabson <dfr@nlsystems.com> To: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@zippy.cdrom.com> Cc: Warner Losh <imp@harmony.village.org>, Chuck Robey <chuckr@mat.net>, freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: gcc Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.05.9902280931360.47102-100000@herring.nlsystems.com> In-Reply-To: <20655.920182749@zippy.cdrom.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, 27 Feb 1999, Jordan K. Hubbard wrote: > > I for one would love to see 2.8.1 or newer in the tree for my own, > > selfish reasons. Many ports (new architectures) would benefit from > > this. > > Is that to say that you prefer it over egcs 1.1.1? If so, why? I have found egcs to be slightly better at C++ code (for my own projects anyway). I believe that it may produce better code too but I don't have any real evidence. -- Doug Rabson Mail: dfr@nlsystems.com Nonlinear Systems Ltd. Phone: +44 181 442 9037 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.05.9902280931360.47102-100000>