Date: Sun, 23 Nov 2003 20:40:45 -0500 From: Rahul Siddharthan <rsidd@online.fr> To: Duncan Barclay <dmlb@dmlb.org> Cc: chat@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Unfortunate dynamic linking for everything Message-ID: <20031124014045.GA8152@online.fr> In-Reply-To: <017701c3b21f$f39bf340$43c8a8c0@orac>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
<3FBC2053.6040208@mindspring.com><20031120022009.GB29530@dan.emsphone.com>
<3FBC29EF.3030009@mindspring.com><3FBC50DB.3000002@acm.org>
<20031123225117.GA24696@dragon.nuxi.com><017701c3b21f$f39bf340$43c8a8c0@orac>
X-Operating-System: Linux 2.4.20 i686
Duncan Barclay wrote:
> From: "David O'Brien" <obrien@freebsd.org>
>
> > I'll seriously argue against the 2nd point above. I don't know of a
> > SINGLE person that uses /bin/sh as their interactive shell when
> > multi-user. Not ONE. Every Bourne shell'ish user I've ever met
> > uses
> > Bash, AT&T ksh, pdksh, zsh.
>
> I don't know anyone that farms lama's, so there cannot be any lama
> farmers.
I very much doubt there are any.
"The one-l lama is a priest
The two-l llama is a beast
And I will bet a silk pajama
You'll never see a three-l lllama"
-- Ogden Nash.
- Rahul
help
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20031124014045.GA8152>