Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2009 21:39:41 +0200 From: Volodymyr Kostyrko <c.kworr@gmail.com> To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: NTFS in GENERIC: opt-in or opt-out? Message-ID: <gl2ktt$1ao$1@ger.gmane.org> In-Reply-To: <20090119081843.GA49607@onelab2.iet.unipi.it> References: <49742ADA.5080509@FreeBSD.org> <20090119081843.GA49607@onelab2.iet.unipi.it>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Luigi Rizzo wrote: >> I am reviewing differences between amd64 and i386 GENERIC kernels and >> noticed that for some unclear reason we ship amd64 GENERIC with NTFS >> module compiled in, while i386 without it. IMHO both should match. The >> question is whether NTFS should be i386 way (opt in) or amd64 way (opt >> out) in GENERIC? What do people think? > > given that the sysutils/fusefs-ntfs seems to be much better, > I'd rather remove the in-kernel ntfs from both and replace > with a note on what to do to use fusefs-ntfs That's not. fuse-ntfs can't work with 4G files. -- Sphinx of black quartz judge my vow.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?gl2ktt$1ao$1>