Date: 1 Jul 99 02:45:20 PDT From: Jesus Monroy <jesus.monroy@usa.net> To: Nik Clayton <nik@nothing-going-on.demon.co.uk> Cc: doc@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [Re: what is the policy for builtin shell functions?] Message-ID: <19990701094520.16438.qmail@www0w.netaddress.usa.net>
index | next in thread | raw e-mail
Nik Clayton <nik@nothing-going-on.demon.co.uk> wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 29, 1999 at 12:48:02PM -0700, Jesus Monroy wrote:
> > I've note many builtin functions for csh(1) and sh(1)
> > have no apropos(1) or whatis(1).
> >
> > Especially annoying are 'limit' and 'unlimit'.
>
> Couldn't agree more. Please file a PR about this. One that includes
> patches would be greatly appreciated. Thanks.
>
Can't patch, don't know how.
Don't want to CVS (at all).
Can PR. What do you want include? Where do I PR?
How is it done?
---
"I'd rather pay for my freedom than live in a bitmapped,
pop-up-happy dungeon like NT."
http://www.performancecomputing.com/features/9809of1.shtml
____________________________________________________________________
Get free e-mail and a permanent address at http://www.netaddress.com/?N=1
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-doc" in the body of the message
help
Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?19990701094520.16438.qmail>