Date: Sun, 11 Mar 2018 10:53:46 -0700 (PDT) From: "Rodney W. Grimes" <freebsd@pdx.rh.CN85.dnsmgr.net> To: =?UTF-8?Q?Pint=C3=A9r=2C_Oliv=C3=A9r?= <oliver.pinter@balabit.com> Cc: rgrimes@freebsd.org, Eitan Adler <eadler@freebsd.org>, svn-src-stable@freebsd.org, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, src-committers <src-committers@freebsd.org>, svn-src-stable-11@freebsd.org, John Baldwin <jhb@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: svn commit: r330451 - in stable/11/sys: dev/iwm dev/otus dev/usb/wlan net80211 Message-ID: <201803111753.w2BHrk7R074877@pdx.rh.CN85.dnsmgr.net> In-Reply-To: <CAGbp8UtBQzxRiUiEQs-x1bmyDnV-aFX8pYwTsbP6CFSg2TDA1w@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> On Thu, Mar 8, 2018 at 12:51 PM, Pint?r, Oliv?r <oliver.pinter@balabit.com> > wrote: > > > > > > > On Thu, Mar 8, 2018 at 12:18 AM, Rodney W. Grimes < > > freebsd@pdx.rh.cn85.dnsmgr.net> wrote: > > > >> > On 7 March 2018 at 09:37, John Baldwin <jhb@freebsd.org> wrote: > >> > > On Tuesday, March 06, 2018 06:46:37 PM Eitan Adler wrote: > >> > >> On 6 March 2018 at 08:26, John Baldwin <jhb@freebsd.org> wrote: > >> > >> > On Monday, March 05, 2018 07:13:59 PM Eitan Adler wrote: > >> > >> >> On 5 March 2018 at 10:08, John Baldwin <jhb@freebsd.org> wrote: > >> > >> >> > On Monday, March 05, 2018 07:54:58 AM Eitan Adler wrote: > >> > >> >> >> Author: eadler > >> > >> >> >> Date: Mon Mar 5 07:54:57 2018 > >> > >> >> >> New Revision: 330451 > >> > >> >> >> URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/330451 > >> > >> >> >> > >> > >> >> >> Log: > >> > >> >> >> MFC r306837: > >> > >> >> >> > >> > >> >> >> [net80211] extend the ieee80211_rx_stats struct to include > >> more information. > >> > >> >> > > >> > >> >> > Have you thought about the KBI implications of this change and > >> some of the > >> > >> >> > other changes you've merged? > >> > >> >> > >> > >> >> I do have a copy of the modules from 11.1 and have loaded them at > >> > >> >> various points in time after merging. That said, I am not perfect. > >> > >> >> Unfortunately, my -STABLE box did not have fully functioning > >> drivers > >> > >> >> before these changes so its difficult to test anything beyond > >> "loads > >> > >> >> and does not panic.". I havn't done so today yet, but that will > >> happen > >> > >> >> soon. > >> > >> >> > >> > >> >> Ensuring these things work through code inspection is certainly > >> > >> >> possible and I've skipped over several changes as a result. > >> > >> > > >> > >> > Loading a module doesn't alone doesn't actually test for breakage. > >> > >> > >> > >> I'm aware. In this case I should likely just revert this change since > >> > >> its a pretty blatant break. > >> > > > >> > > I suspect many of these changes for iwm, etc. are all intertwined so > >> I'm not > >> > > sure if you can leave out individual ones. > >> > > >> > Possibly. I do have iwm working on my laptop though. I also know of > >> > one open PR assigned to me w.r.t. a model I don't own. I'll be > >> > addressing it some time this week. > >> > >> I believe I also have a tester of stable/11 iwm patches avaliable, > >> he has an 8265? ^^^^ Its an 8565, my mistake. > >> > > > > At weekend I will test them. > > > > Sorry, -ENOTIME for 8265 this weekend, but it working fine (and much more > stable) with 7260. Thanks for keeping us informed. I am uncertain as to the state of iwm in stable/11, should the Intel 8565ac work, or not? I have exchanged an additional round of email with the volunteer tester, he says he is running an unmodified stable/11, now trying to find out if he is updating that regular or not. Hopefully we can have some test results soon. Thanks, -- Rod Grimes rgrimes@freebsd.org
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?201803111753.w2BHrk7R074877>