Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2018 13:35:24 -0600 From: Ian Lepore <ian@freebsd.org> To: Mark Linimon <linimon@lonesome.com> Cc: cem@freebsd.org, Stephen Kiernan <hackagadget@gmail.com>, svn-src-head@freebsd.org, Eitan Adler <lists@eitanadler.com>, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, src-committers <src-committers@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: svn commit: r335402 - head/sbin/veriexecctl Message-ID: <1529609724.24573.40.camel@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <20180621190256.GE3654@lonesome.com> References: <201806200108.w5K18sIR050132@repo.freebsd.org> <CAF6rxgkNFfLUZYrjX45p-33C7qZEFMVURSd5w0Z0wBA=vAvTNQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAF6rxgmoi=sEoQyHYr=E8syBgX7au%2BvMmk34L-VfG_sZOMeTyg@mail.gmail.com> <CAEm%2B2uUfBefgHWW4WRxbS0KYSnk1FY_j28H9pTOGWhp4GoSREw@mail.gmail.com> <CAG6CVpXAVvxLNQX%2BHWZ50-U4AcHeL0ADYViLzZMXyyJ02TDddQ@mail.gmail.com> <1529606006.24573.30.camel@freebsd.org> <20180621190256.GE3654@lonesome.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, 2018-06-21 at 19:02 +0000, Mark Linimon wrote: > On Thu, Jun 21, 2018 at 12:33:26PM -0600, Ian Lepore wrote: > > > > Hiding work in patchsets and reviews and alternate branches and > > other > > shadowy places because it's not perfect > I do not consider bugzilla and phabricator to be "shadowy places"; > therefore, I reject this argument. > > Although I don't have statistics, AFAICT phabricator patches have a > better-than-even chance of going in. > > But, in any case, a middle position would have been to commit this to > a vendor branch and publish instructions on how to grab it from there > and enable it. > > I understand that -current will have regressions in it. However, the > pendulum has recently swung in the direction of "free-for-all". This > slows down (e.g.) my own work on -currernt such as testing arm boards > and trying to fix ports there. ATM I'm not even *attempting* to do > the > latter because I have little faith that any -current I bring in past > the one I'm locked down to (r333619 May 16 UTC 2018) will do anything > but burn my time trying to track down regressions. > > tl:dr; I have enough work to do without trying to fix other people's > stuff. If that's harsh, so be it. > > mcl > I guess you missed the part about all of this new code being optional and compiled-in only if you add the new options to your kernel config? -- Ian
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1529609724.24573.40.camel>