Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2018 12:56:38 -0700 From: Lee Brown <leeb@ratnaling.org> To: FreeBSD-Net <freebsd-net@freebsd.org> Subject: Using ALTQ with bce and not igb on same box Message-ID: <CAFPNf5-dOAWDPZrHUycRdsuCBtAV02DAfb-kz2r3Ud0k=QS9Dw@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi all, I'm setting up a system with 4 NIC's, 2 igb and 2 bce. I plan to deploy it like: Switch-VoIP - igb0 bce0 :: HFSC - 65mb/s-Radio Switch-LAN - igb1 bce1 :: HFSC - 1000mb/s-Radio Where the traffic flow is typically igb0 <--> bce0, igb1 <--> bce1. With reference to the patch on https://bugs.freebsd.org/ bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=213257 (Crash in IGB driver with ALTQ), am I correct in understanding I can: Enable ALTQ in the kernel and use HFSC on the bce NIC's. Not enable ALTQ_IGB and use the igb's without any altq's, running igb1 at full speed. I would apply this on 11.2 RELEASE and use ipfw. 2nd Question: Any issues running em's at full speed with HFSC? The other side of that radio bridge has igb's right now and I'd like to drop in a 2-port low profile PCI ( https://www.intel.com/content/www/us/en/ethernet-products/gigabit-server-adapters/1000-pt-dual-port-server-adapter-brief.html ) Any thoughts most welcome, thanks -- lee
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAFPNf5-dOAWDPZrHUycRdsuCBtAV02DAfb-kz2r3Ud0k=QS9Dw>