Date: Thu, 18 Apr 1996 23:55:56 +0200 (MET DST) From: J Wunsch <j@uriah.heep.sax.de> To: ache@astral.msk.su (=?KOI8-R?Q?=E1=CE=C4=D2=C5=CA_=FE=C5=D2=CE=CF=D7?=) Cc: joerg_wunsch@uriah.heep.sax.de, scrappy@freefall.freebsd.org, freebsd-bugs@freefall.freebsd.org, core@freebsd.org, muir@idiom.com Subject: Re: bin/1019 Message-ID: <199604182155.XAA03014@uriah.heep.sax.de> In-Reply-To: <199604182136.BAA00940@astral.msk.su> from "=?KOI8-R?Q?=E1=CE=C4=D2=C5=CA_=FE=C5=D2=CE=CF=D7?=" at Apr 19, 96 01:36:48 am
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
As =?KOI8-R?Q?=E1=CE=C4=D2=C5=CA_=FE=C5=D2=CE=CF=D7?= wrote: > > dialer?), but the reason that some PPP packages don't understand a > > regular Unix login sequence but wanna use PAP or CHAP instead doesn't > > sound totally unreasonable. At least, everything is hidden inside a > > If you use PAP/CHAP only, don't even start getty over this line, > just start pppd on it directly. It's my understanding that the site where David M. Sharnoff (sp?) is wants to provide both services on the same modem lines, PPP (with sole PAP/CHAP authentication), and regular (or UUCP) logins. The problem is caused by Netcrap not allowing for a regular login: sequence, apparently. -- cheers, J"org joerg_wunsch@uriah.heep.sax.de -- http://www.sax.de/~joerg/ -- NIC: JW11-RIPE Never trust an operating system you don't have sources for. ;-)
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199604182155.XAA03014>