Date: Sun, 9 Jul 1995 08:35:50 -0700 (PDT) From: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk> To: rkw@dataplex.net (Richard Wackerbarth) Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Version numbers of the different branches? Message-ID: <199507091535.IAA02269@freefall.cdrom.com> In-Reply-To: <v02120d00ac258c409af8@[199.183.109.242]> from "Richard Wackerbarth" at Jul 9, 95 08:43:33 am
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> >("BUILT-950703" ? Hey, He hasn't got the "ls -s panic" patch that
> >got comitted on july 5th !)
>
> "BUILT-950708" -- Does he have it?
>
> IMHO, "2.1d0803" where 0803 represents the CTM update level
> or "2.1d950706" where that represents the date of the source file sup
> would be more useful.
The CTM sequence number will not be put into it. CTM has nothing to
do with our kernel.
If anything we should have a cronjob update the version-string automatically
every day.
--
Poul-Henning Kamp | phk@FreeBSD.ORG FreeBSD Core-team.
http://www.freebsd.org/~phk | phk@login.dknet.dk Private mailbox.
whois: [PHK] | phk@ref.tfs.com TRW Financial Systems, Inc.
Just that: dried leaves in boiling water ?
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199507091535.IAA02269>