Date: Fri, 05 Dec 2014 14:55:58 +0100 (CET) From: sthaug@nethelp.no To: borjam@sarenet.es Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org, killing@multiplay.co.uk Subject: Re: Fix Emulex "oce" driver in CURRENT Message-ID: <20141205.145558.74680295.sthaug@nethelp.no> In-Reply-To: <FF410A78-138C-412C-8CC1-40CADF4AF6CD@sarenet.es> References: <8BA1A243-8EA9-449A-A2D2-4E03487CE3E0@sarenet.es> <5481AC78.6050107@multiplay.co.uk> <FF410A78-138C-412C-8CC1-40CADF4AF6CD@sarenet.es>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> >> Seems 10.1 is on the pipeline now, but as far as I know none of th=
ese fixes have been applied to -STABLE. Any chances to do it yet? As fa=
r as I know, the "oce" driver is currently unusable in -STABLE. I manag=
ed to cause a panic reliably within 30 seconds.
> > =
> > Was there any conclusion to this, current and releng/10.0 & releng/=
10.1 seem pretty similar with regards oce but a customer is reporting p=
anics very similar to this thread.
> > =
> > Did the commit of the additional locking never make it in?
> =
> Not as far as I know. I=B4ve updated a couple of machines here to 10-=
STABLE and I've been applying the patch manually myself. =
> =
> I don't think it's been applied even to -HEAD. =
Where can I find a version of the patch to be applied to 10-STABLE? Is
this the one?
https://bz-attachments.freebsd.org/attachment.cgi?id=3D144718
Steinar Haug, Nethelp consulting, sthaug@nethelp.no
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20141205.145558.74680295.sthaug>