Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 13 Apr 1997 02:33:40 -0700
From:      John-Mark Gurney <jmg@hydrogen.nike.efn.org>
To:        "Jeffrey J. Mountin" <sysop@mixcom.com>
Cc:        isp@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Some advice needed.
Message-ID:  <19970413023340.27101@hydrogen.nike.efn.org>
In-Reply-To: <3.0.32.19970413032749.00cf3968@mixcom.com>; from Jeffrey J. Mountin on Sun, Apr 13, 1997 at 03:27:49AM -0500
References:  <3.0.32.19970413032749.00cf3968@mixcom.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Jeffrey J. Mountin scribbled this message on Apr 13:
> At 05:59 PM 4/13/97 +1000, Daniel O'Callaghan wrote:
> >On Sat, 12 Apr 1997, Vincent Poy wrote:
> >K5 works fine with FreeBSD.  8MB is enough, especially if you have plenty 
> >of swap.  I know of a 486DX4-120 with 8 MB RAM running 30 permanent 
> >kernel ppp (/usr/sbin/pppd) sessions.  It thrashes like hell during 
> >startup, but then it settles down.  It is also running gated.  I did 
> >recommend to the owner that he give it more RAM, though.  Note that pppd 
> >is mostly swapped out for normal use.
> 
> Wasn't this in an ISP environment?  Using swap is slow and won't matter
> much for a workstation, but for a server 32Mb should be the start point.
> For a DNS only server, 16Mb.

yes... but we are talking about a terminal server... they have very small
memory foot prints as you normally don't run much on one... right now my
diskless termserver has a HUMONGOUS size of 13megs...  hmm...  something
must be wrong... the last time I checked it was only 6-7megs...  of course
I can login to it via serial console and get plenty of stats from the
machine...

would people be interested in a remote statistics gathering program? you
would run a small daemon on the terminal server (or anything else) then
you could connect to the machine with a client and obtain any info you
might want from it...

> >As for 100 vs 10 Mbps, calculate the b/w of your modems....
> 
> PCI helps to keep down collisions, at that is what I have seen from a mix
> of 16 bit NICs and 10/100 PCI cards using 10bT.  YMMV

hmm... interesting.. I would think that PCI would keep the host processor
a bit more free to do other things...  guess I'll have to finally invest in
a PCI ethernet addapter for my maine server...  ttyl...

-- 
  John-Mark
  Cu Networking                             Modem/FAX: +1 541 683 6954

  Live in Peace, destroy Micro$oft, support free software, run FreeBSD



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?19970413023340.27101>