Date: Sun, 4 Jun 2000 18:21:28 -0700 (PDT) From: "Jonathan M. Bresler" <jmb@hub.freebsd.org> To: jkh@zippy.cdrom.com Cc: wollman@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu, jwd@FreeBSD.org, cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/bin/df df.1 df.c Message-ID: <20000605012128.CFBE237B555@hub.freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <22036.960073573@localhost> (jkh@zippy.cdrom.com)
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> > > > That's called `BLOCKSIZE=1G df', thank you very much. > > BZZZZT. You could do df -k with `BLOCKSIZE=1K df' too but I don't see [snip] > FWIW, I didn't like the idea of another flag much either (we gonna add > -g to du(1) next? It has a -k flag too) but I couldn't argue against > it from a POLA or consistency standpoint (there is -k AND there is yes, seems if we are going to add -g to df, we should add it to du as well. just one and not the other is confusing. simarily we should add a -m to both df and du. having -k and -g but not -m is very strange indeed. jmb To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20000605012128.CFBE237B555>