Date: Thu, 07 Feb 2013 22:05:13 -0800 From: Xin Li <delphij@delphij.net> To: Giorgos Keramidas <keramida@FreeBSD.org> Cc: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Do we really need articles/cvs-freebsd anymore? Message-ID: <51149599.7060503@delphij.net> In-Reply-To: <20130208055308.GA30647@saturn> References: <20130208055308.GA30647@saturn>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 On 2/7/13 9:53 PM, Giorgos Keramidas wrote: > Hi everyone, > > Now that everything (src, ports, doc) has moved off CVS, does it > make sense to keep articles/cvs-freebsd around anymore? I think > it's probably better to point people away from ncvs/dcvs-style > setups. > > It may also be worth replacing the cvs-freebsd article with > something that talks about subversion, or even some of the git > repositories mentioned in https://wiki.freebsd.org/GitWorkflow - > but this can be done separately. > > So what do you think, is it ok to 'svn rm' the cvs-freebsd/ article > and then look into replacing it with something more modern? CVS is still being used in internal repositories including re@ and secteam@, it's easy to set up and works fine for small groups. I think writing new articles should take higher priority than removing old ones, especially when there is no new article that acts similar role of the old ones... Just my $0.02 Cheers, -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJRFJWZAAoJEG80Jeu8UPuzXXcH/1OjHM7lwiBuMlGtel9PCcNf zSxX5V4rKWa5VRmNSkpyl9S/ZzRMRGq+bdsU6roexklg9Y91adVSmGD2gLg+0MCy JcWP8JOBIL/+XPOF3c8lyp1HfqusO9eoJF4HhwIKo2f32S4dcHSDf69NhMoPvVIY xSPRQgMkH0tCySlP2cGpQ2P4/4mPe5RyIHFilfagTCaaWHywhWQl8fV64KLkHDiL 8IaR2Dwt0dCAQMOkqXa6YXGv5J4qHOgZOkgWBLOb11X4adDgtRSfCWJAfy+xXRpp rqwGTdZAmGypT8kxfseJniT9B3Rnq/8DT5O/B5p7RcbmLGbsFDWdsC49gpZDmD4= =Yua0 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?51149599.7060503>