Date: Thu, 25 Jan 1996 16:29:43 -0500 (EST) From: "Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy@ki.net> To: current@freebsd.org Subject: ether_sprintf bug: possible patch? Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.3.91.960125162519.9225c-100000@ki.net>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi...
Just searched through if_ed.c, which is dated as being last
modified yesterday (Jan24) to see if I can find what is going on, and
found this:
<excerpt from if_ed.c>
/*
* Print additional info when attached
*/
printf("ed%d: address %6D, ", isa_dev->id_unit,
sc->arpcom.ac_enaddr, ":");
if (sc->type_str && (*sc->type_str != 0))
printf("type %s ", sc->type_str);
else
printf("type unknown (0x%x) ", sc->type);
printf("%s ", sc->isa16bit ? "(16 bit)" : "(8 bit)");
printf("%s\n", ((sc->vendor == ED_VENDOR_3COM) &&
(ifp->if_flags & IFF_ALTPHYS)) ? " tranceiver disabled" : "");
ki# grep ether_sprintf if_ep.c
printf(" address %s", ether_sprintf(sc->arpcom.ac_enaddr));
Can someone clarify for me as to whether I would be correct in
assuming that the following "patch" would work or break something? I'm
going to to try it, but, if I'm missing something due to ignorance... :(
*** if_ep.c.orig Thu Jan 25 16:28:22 1996
--- if_ep.c Thu Jan 25 16:28:53 1996
***************
*** 408,414 ****
GO_WINDOW(2);
outw(BASE + EP_W2_ADDR_0 + (i * 2), ntohs(p[i]));
}
! printf(" address %s", ether_sprintf(sc->arpcom.ac_enaddr));
/*
* Write IRQ value to board
--- 408,414 ----
GO_WINDOW(2);
outw(BASE + EP_W2_ADDR_0 + (i * 2), ntohs(p[i]));
}
! printf(" address %6D", sc->arpcom.ac_enaddr);
/*
* Write IRQ value to board
Marc G. Fournier | POP Mail Telnet Acct DNS Hosting
System | WWW Services Database Services | Knowledge,
Administrator | | Information and
scrappy@ki.net | WWW: http://www.ki.net | Communications, Inc
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.3.91.960125162519.9225c-100000>