Date: Mon, 12 Apr 2004 10:42:08 +0930 From: "Paul A. Hoadley" <paulh@logicsquad.net> To: "Gary W. Swearingen" <underway@comcast.net> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: GPL: implications for FreeBSD-on-hardware for sale? Message-ID: <20040412011208.GG92584@grover.logicsquad.net> In-Reply-To: <c665c6o92w.5c6@mail.comcast.net> References: <20040410074515.GS85168@grover.logicsquad.net> <20040410084629.GB8301@happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk> <20040410102653.GA92584@grover.logicsquad.net> <l3lll3ogjl.ll3@mail.comcast.net> <20040411013632.GC92584@grover.logicsquad.net> <c665c6o92w.5c6@mail.comcast.net>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
[-- Attachment #1 --] On Sun, Apr 11, 2004 at 07:58:15AM -0700, Gary W. Swearingen wrote: > "Paul A. Hoadley" <paulh@logicsquad.net> writes: > > > Maybe some more specifics would be helpful. The application is a > > web application. It may or may not end up open source, but it > > will be for sale, and I don't want it to inherit a restrictive > > license. > > Even BSD licenses are restrictive, By restrictive, I mean a license that forces itself onto other code, whether by way of the other code being a derivative work, using the licensed code, or just sitting on the same distribution medium. The main issue here is simply that I don't _necessarily_ want to distribute source code to the application. (Of course, if the code remains largely PHP, I'll essentially be doing that anyway.) I don't want the decision to be pre-made just by interacting with other software. -- Paul. mailto:paulh@logicsquad.net [-- Attachment #2 --] -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFAeezn730Z/jysbzIRAj0zAKCCtfnZN1jNiW4KrTzyNIgRRUsuXQCdEmSD wqonxbRFi8nxf7s7WhdYZhQ= =yYxv -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----home | help
Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040412011208.GG92584>