Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2019 16:03:18 -0800 (PST) From: "Rodney W. Grimes" <freebsd-rwg@pdx.rh.CN85.dnsmgr.net> To: Warner Losh <imp@bsdimp.com> Cc: "Julian H. Stacey" <jhs@berklix.com>, FreeBSD Current <current@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: timed restoral until deleter makes a port Message-ID: <201901250003.x0P03ImG085514@pdx.rh.CN85.dnsmgr.net> In-Reply-To: <CANCZdfqG7aKVov3NDi6gY0YSFvMjoB0QcBUxabYghE4rGcDg6w@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> On Thu, Jan 24, 2019 at 4:13 PM Julian H. Stacey <jhs@berklix.com> wrote: > > > Current box here is now about 10 seconds ahead, since timed was deleted, > > still waiting for the code vandal who removed timed from src/ > > without proper discussion in advance, to move timed from src/ to ports/ > > > > timed absence will bite more people when 13 is released. timed > > should be restored to src/ until the code vandal is forced to write > > a ports/ entry. Temporary removal of the src/ commit bit could encourage > > this & admonish irresponsible conduct. > > > > The tech issues have been discussed before, no need to repeat, > > this is just a question of enforcing responsible procedure. > > > > The ball is in my court to approve a pull request so we can finish the > port. We have plenty of time before 13 and current, is after all, current. > So there's no need to do anything rash here. > > I think all the rest of this is without merit and an overreaction. Lets prevent this in the future and make it formal policy that if the solution to a removal from src is that a port be created the order must be port created and working, then src de-orbit. Agreeable? -- Rod Grimes rgrimes@freebsd.org
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?201901250003.x0P03ImG085514>