Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 27 Apr 2001 18:17:23 -0400 (EDT)
From:      mi@aldan.algebra.com
To:        Jonathan Fortin <jfortin@akalink.com>, ahl@austclear.com.au, brooks@one-eyed-alien.net
Cc:        questions@freebsd.org, net@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: maxing out the 100Mb TX (full duplex)
Message-ID:  <200104272217.f3RMHOC77541@misha.privatelabs.com>
In-Reply-To: <002d01c0cedf$76c932e0$0200320a@node00>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 27 Apr, Jonathan Fortin wrote:
= Hello,
= 
= You can do  etherchannel on freebsd with ng_one2many. Man  it for more
= information, but briefly,
=
= It is used to load balance incoming and outgoing data in a round robin
= fashion across the interfaces that are added on the "hook".

Ok,  the switch  does support  EtherChannel (calling  it "aggregation").
Now, should  we try the wpaul's  fec or the ng_one2many?  And what's the
difference? Thanks a lot for your time, gentlemen!

	-mi


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200104272217.f3RMHOC77541>