Date: Wed, 20 Oct 1999 22:10:03 -0400 (EDT) From: Jamie Howard <howardjp@wam.umd.edu> To: Jeroen Ruigrok/Asmodai <asmodai@wxs.nl> Cc: hackers@FreeBSD.ORG, Bill Fumerola <billf@FreeBSD.ORG>, Bruce Evans <bde@FreeBSD.ORG> Subject: Re: getopt.h Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.10.9910202208220.10254-100000@dragon.ham.muohio.edu> In-Reply-To: <19991020221007.A90211@daemon.ninth-circle.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, 20 Oct 1999, Jeroen Ruigrok/Asmodai wrote: > Well I searched the mailinglists and didn't really got further than > discovering that unistd.h goes a little way to provide functionality > which getopt.h from glibc provides. And seeing that a question of Bill > early 1999 never got answered correctly. I cc:'d Bruce on this since I > value his stylistic mindset on this issue. Speaking of which, are we ever going to get a getopt_long()? NetBSD's compiles and runs fine if you hack out your own getopt.h, which looks a whole lot like the one at the end of the original message. :) Jamie To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.LNX.4.10.9910202208220.10254-100000>