Date: Wed, 5 Jan 2000 07:00:49 -0500 (EST) From: Daniel Eischen <eischen@vigrid.com> To: eischen@vigrid.com, tg@melaten.rwth-aachen.de Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: HEADS UP: major number for libc_r bumped Message-ID: <200001051200.HAA14331@pcnet1.pcnet.com>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Thomas Gellekum <tg@melaten.rwth-aachen.de> wrote: > due to some interface changes (different internal layout of pthread_t, > POSIX compliant implementation of pthread_rwlockattr_setpshared()) I > had to increase the major number of libc_r.so. Just another thought here. What happens when -current becomes the -stable branch and we're forced to bump library versions again? Are we going to end up with libc_r.so.5 in -stable and libc_r.so.4 in current? Dan Eischen eischen@vigrid.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200001051200.HAA14331>