Date: Sat, 6 Feb 1999 05:37:30 -0400 (AST) From: The Hermit Hacker <scrappy@hub.org> To: "Dan O'Connor" <dan@jgl.reno.nv.us> Cc: Frank Warren <clovis@home.com>, freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Unix vs unix-like and unix-type Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.05.9902060536370.368-100000@thelab.hub.org> In-Reply-To: <057a01be51aa$b1cdd760$ed3ce4cf@danco.home>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, 6 Feb 1999, Dan O'Connor wrote:
> Well, true. The Microsoft y2k database lists Win98 as being y2k compliant.
> Lo-and-behold, the Windows Update site now has a y2k patch for Win98.
Solaris 2.6 is the same...listed as being y2k compliant, but there are
several y2k related patches available for it...*shrug*
Marc G. Fournier
Systems Administrator @ hub.org
primary: scrappy@hub.org secondary: scrappy@{freebsd|postgresql}.org
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.05.9902060536370.368-100000>