Date: Sat, 06 Oct 2007 08:23:24 -0600 From: Scott Long <scottl@samsco.org> To: =?UTF-8?B?RGFnLUVybGluZyBTbcO4cmdyYXY=?= <des@des.no> Cc: Jack F Vogel <jfv@freebsd.org>, cvs-src@freebsd.org, src-committers@freebsd.org, Jack Vogel <jfvogel@gmail.com>, cvs-all@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/conf files kern.pre.mk src/sys/dev/em LICENSE e1000_80003es2lan.c e1000_80003es2lan.h e1000_82540.c e1000_82541.c e1000_82541.h e1000_82542.c e1000_82543.c e1000_82543.h e1000_82571.c e1000_82571.h e1000_82575.c ... Message-ID: <47079A5C.3090109@samsco.org> In-Reply-To: <86d4vspk8j.fsf@ds4.des.no> References: <200710052249.l95Mn9Nb071852@repoman.freebsd.org> <20071005231538.GA24016@owl.midgard.homeip.net> <2a41acea0710051705l217224b6vc705dc6139b94e3b@mail.gmail.com> <20071006004634.GA24962@owl.midgard.homeip.net> <47073AF5.1010109@samsco.org> <86d4vspk8j.fsf@ds4.des.no>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote: > Scott Long <scottl@samsco.org> writes: > >>What do you expect to accomplish by lecturing a vendor who has shown >>very good faith over the years in supporting FreeBSD? Maybe we should >>tell Intel to piss off since you obviously know how to support their >>hardware much better than they do. > > > We used to have a principle that commit bits were granted to individuals > on their individual merit, not simply because they represented a vendor > and were paid to work on drivers for that vendor's hardware. > Are you implying that Jack has no merit? That's an unfortunate assertion. What evidence do you have to support that? > We also used to have a principle that changes should be tested before > being committed, especially to -STABLE. I guess you missed that part where Jack said that the changes had undergone extensive testing. Scott
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?47079A5C.3090109>