Date: Sun, 27 Apr 2003 20:34:14 +0300 From: Vallo Kallaste <kalts@estpak.ee> To: Wesley Morgan <morganw@chemikals.org> Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: libthr broken Message-ID: <20030427173414.GA20023@kevad.internal> In-Reply-To: <20030427102416.C41722@volatile.chemikals.org> References: <20030427135506.GA1625@kevad.internal> <20030427102416.C41722@volatile.chemikals.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, Apr 27, 2003 at 10:26:47AM -0400, Wesley Morgan <morganw@chemikals.org> wrote: > > Does anybody really use libthr? It's broken for me, as long as I > > remember. The real application which best shows off is KNode, just > > jump into some big binaries group and start sniffing around. > > Download some pictures as fast as you can click and watch in a row, > > then stop some downloads and it'll die. But only if the threading > > library is libthr. I believe this isn't KNode's fault as it was for > > long time in KDE 2.x series. > > Maybe I'm confused, but I believe libthr has been in the tree for less > than a month. Give it a break! Maybe you mean pthread, which has also been > updated quite a bit lately. I mean libthr and yes, I know, it's even not installed by default. Besides that, this new library was said to be snap-in replacement for libc_r and considered to work with KDE and Mozilla. No problem, of course, I'm sharing my experiences only, no more no less. -- Vallo Kallaste
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030427173414.GA20023>