Date: Thu, 22 Jun 2006 16:18:39 +0800 From: gnn@freebsd.org To: Robert Watson <rwatson@freebsd.org> Cc: Mark Linimon <linimon@lonesome.com>, freebsd-embedded@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Creation of a new list for Embedded.... Message-ID: <m2psh11u3k.wl%gnn@neville-neil.com> In-Reply-To: <20060621181745.S35462@fledge.watson.org> References: <m21wtlsszn.wl%gnn@neville-neil.com> <20060619115827.A25435@wonkity.com> <m2veqwflzi.wl%gnn@neville-neil.com> <20060621155727.E8526@fledge.watson.org> <20060621170045.GB15163@soaustin.net> <20060621181745.S35462@fledge.watson.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
At Wed, 21 Jun 2006 18:18:21 +0100 (BST), rwatson wrote: > > > On Wed, 21 Jun 2006, Mark Linimon wrote: > > > well, the question is, do discussions about picobsd, nanobsd, etc., which > > may not be intended for what I would consider "embedded systems", move over > > as well? > > > > If so, IMHO there ought to be one list. I can see arguments for either > > choice. > > I think centralizing discussions on this one list make sense also, at least > until such time as it's clear there's enough traffic to justify breaking it > out. In terms of subject matter small and embedded should be identical. If core@ or rwatson@ want to have postmaster move people over then that's fine, but I'm not wearing any asbestos briefs so... Later, George
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?m2psh11u3k.wl%gnn>