Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2001 12:39:46 +0900 From: "Daniel C. Sobral" <dcs@newsguy.com> To: Akinori MUSHA <knu@iDaemons.org> Cc: current@FreeBSD.ORG, Craig Carey <research@ijs.co.nz> Subject: Re: find(1) -regex/-iregex Message-ID: <3A933882.212928AF@newsguy.com> References: <8666i588p4.wl@archon.local.idaemons.org> <5.0.2.1.2.20010221083646.03aaf540@pop.qsi.net.nz> <863dd981ed.wl@archon.local.idaemons.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Akinori MUSHA wrote: > > > I would object if it is a new variant of regexp. I'd say it ought > > be between egrep and perl, in its functionality. ... > > - Perl's regexp is known to be a unique variant that is different > from the "basic regexp" nor the "extended regexp" ;P For that matter, anyone talking about "standard" regexp of any kind I invite to take a look at the include file for gnu regexp, to see just how many slightly different variants of regexp there are out there in various utilities. -- Daniel C. Sobral (8-DCS) dcs@newsguy.com dcs@freebsd.org capo@the.fashionable.bsdconspiracy.net "Too bad sentience isn't a marketable commodity." To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3A933882.212928AF>