Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2011 01:06:52 +0000 From: Alexey Dokuchaev <danfe@FreeBSD.org> To: bf1783@gmail.com Cc: cvs-ports@freebsd.org, ports-committers@freebsd.org, cvs-all@freebsd.org, Brendan Fabeny <bf@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/devel/cppcheck Makefile distinfo ports/devel/cppcheck/files patch-Makefile patch-cli__cmdlineparser.cpp Message-ID: <20111212010652.GA2317@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <CAGFTUwN6W7FK7R8fKD_6WdpOJNQxXj77_R4gU5=Z%2Bx4%2By_Qc=w@mail.gmail.com> References: <201112110544.pBB5isZ0077815@repoman.freebsd.org> <20111211075324.GA25226@FreeBSD.org> <CAGFTUwN6W7FK7R8fKD_6WdpOJNQxXj77_R4gU5=Z%2Bx4%2By_Qc=w@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, Dec 11, 2011 at 04:05:45PM +0000, b. f. wrote: > On 12/11/11, Alexey Dokuchaev <danfe@freebsd.org> wrote: > > I understand that this case is special, as manpage gets indeed built and > > taints dependencies with some junk. Maybe you can ask upstream to provide > > precompiled version next time? > > I know it is not the typical use of this variable (although one could > argue that it should be), but as you point out, my rationale for the > change was based on the fact that the manpages here require installing > additional dependencies, which users may wish to avoid. I will ask > upstream to consider supplying a pre-compiled version. Thanks! ./danfe
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20111212010652.GA2317>