Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 6 May 2020 09:35:38 +0200
From:      Andrea Venturoli <ml@netfence.it>
To:        Jason Tubnor <jason@tubnor.net>, FreeBSD virtualization <freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: bhyve win-guest benchmark comparing
Message-ID:  <93773166-888d-c1cc-007e-d51b432a6d8a@netfence.it>
In-Reply-To: <CACLnyCKVN1LMSe2Y4h1Mh-549QSHKyZh1WDMV4E1cdH9guGEWQ@mail.gmail.com>
References:  <9e7f4c01-6cd1-4045-1a5b-69c804b3881b@omnilan.de> <f5a78199-9306-bccc-606a-23c30f56b0f1@omnilan.de> <20200419172345.Horde.alwm2Bn67wrcUt5a0zVjQ9f@app.eeeit.de> <69553fba-4ee5-67dc-a052-b58bb8100061@netfence.it> <20200420090934.d6gkjg5er5ij36d2@nexus.home.palmen-it.de> <CACLnyCKVN1LMSe2Y4h1Mh-549QSHKyZh1WDMV4E1cdH9guGEWQ@mail.gmail.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 2020-04-20 12:06, Jason Tubnor wrote:
> On Mon., 20 Apr. 2020, 7:09 pm Felix Palmen, <felix@palmen-it.de> wrote:
> 
>>
>>> Xeon are not affected, since they have vAPIC, so they should be already
>>> running as fast as possible. Correct?
>>
>> I don't know the details, but on my Xeon E3-1240L v5, it did have a huge
>> effect.

I confirm this made a huge effect on a Xeon E3-1220, while it 
(obviously) made no difference on a Ryzen 7 2700.

I'll try this ASAP on a Core i5-9400 and a Core(TM) i5-7400 :)

  bye & Thanks
	av.



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?93773166-888d-c1cc-007e-d51b432a6d8a>