Date: Wed, 01 Oct 2003 21:45:57 +0300 From: Petri Helenius <pete@he.iki.fi> To: Bruce M Simpson <bms@spc.org> Cc: fenner@freebsd.org Subject: Re: I would like to tcpdump and get all the packets... Message-ID: <3F7B20E5.6010301@he.iki.fi> In-Reply-To: <20031001171158.GK13612@saboteur.dek.spc.org> References: <20030917182850.Q52432-100000@mail.econolodgetulsa.com> <20030918014203.GA59403@k7.mavetju> <3F694D56.9040609@he.iki.fi> <20030918124311.GC3431@saboteur.dek.spc.org> <3F6A1CA9.5030701@he.iki.fi> <20030918210538.GB2720@saboteur.dek.spc.org> <3F6A2710.5090000@he.iki.fi> <20031001171158.GK13612@saboteur.dek.spc.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Bruce M Simpson wrote: > >This is coming up more often. Perhaps we should consider net/libpcap-devel >and net/tcpdump-devel ports for people who wish to track CVS and/or >snapshots of these tools? This might relieve some of the pressure on Bill >to update the vendor branch so often. > > > How often is "so often"? The vendor branch is over a year old and the bug that seems to annoy most real users of bpf has been known for quite a while longer and took a while to get into the origin and now it only would need to be imported once. Or is there some larger issues I´m missing or is everybody asking the same thing for the same reason and a single update would "calm down" the chatter? Pete
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3F7B20E5.6010301>