Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2010 08:20:02 +0100 (CET) From: Hartmut Brandt <hartmut.brandt@dlr.de> To: Alexander Bubnov <alexander.bubnov@gmail.com> Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org, Harti Brandt <harti@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Poor situation with snmp support in FreeBSD Message-ID: <20100326081637.W46084@beagle.kn.op.dlr.de> In-Reply-To: <c3e287ff1003252225g8aac72aod2ef2396c28175ee@mail.gmail.com> References: <4BAB5A77.7050505@mts.com.ua> <20100325142149.I44999@beagle.kn.op.dlr.de> <c3e287ff1003252225g8aac72aod2ef2396c28175ee@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, 26 Mar 2010, Alexander Bubnov wrote: AB>I am sorry may be I am going to ask often asked question... Why not to AB>implement features which is lacking in net-snmp for FreeBSD instead of AB>writing new snmp (bsnmp)? As a plus net-snmp has BSD like license. Many years ago I needed a small SNMP daemon for controlling some equipment. I looked at ucd-snmp (that was the name than) but decided against it because it was far too big. The even bigger problem was, that it didn't care about handling errors in the places I looked at. I use bsnmp alot in projects to do remote monitoring controlling of equipment - you don't need SNMPv3 for them and it is easy to write a new MIB for bsnmp. harti
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20100326081637.W46084>