Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2007 14:56:43 -0800 From: Alfred Perlstein <alfred@freebsd.org> To: Peter Wood <peter@alastria.net> Cc: FreeBSD Net <freebsd-net@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: bikeshed for all! Message-ID: <20071212225643.GZ61429@elvis.mu.org> In-Reply-To: <476066A5.8070707@alastria.net> References: <476061FD.8050500@elischer.org> <476066A5.8070707@alastria.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
* Peter Wood <peter@alastria.net> [071212 14:53] wrote: > > so, you see I really need a better name.... > > setrtab? > > > > rtab? rtbl? > > > > and the command should be called "????" > > Would "vrf" (Virtual Routing and Forwarding) be to technical? From > experience Cisco's call it vrf, Junipers use routing-instance IIRC. Yes, Juniper calls it "instance", although, I'm quite sure I've heard "vrf" said over the cubes here. -- - Alfred Perlstein
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20071212225643.GZ61429>