Date: Sat, 05 Jun 2010 09:26:59 +0200 From: Adam PAPAI <wooh@wooh.hu> To: Bruce Cran <bruce@cran.org.uk> Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: sysbench / fileio - Linux vs. FreeBSD Message-ID: <4C09FC43.8070804@wooh.hu> In-Reply-To: <201006050236.17697.bruce@cran.org.uk> References: <4C09932B.6040808@wooh.hu> <201006050236.17697.bruce@cran.org.uk>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 6/5/10 3:36 AM, Bruce Cran wrote: > Some quick tests show that ufs does do rather poorly on my system too. I have > the following filesystems setup: > > /var : ufs with softupdates > /usr/obj : zfs with checksums disabled > /usr/src : zfs with compression enabled > /home : zfs with compression disabled and checksums enabled > > I ran a test with a blocksize of 8KB and 16 threads. > > /var : 25.2MB/s > /usr/obj : 64.8MB/s > /usr/src : 386.3MB/s > /home : 60.3MB/s > It seems I have to test it with zfs as well. Tomorrow I'm gonna test it. -- Adam PAPAI
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4C09FC43.8070804>