Date: Fri, 28 May 1999 16:08:46 -0700 From: Don Lewis <Don.Lewis@tsc.tdk.com> To: David Wolfskill <dhw@whistle.com>, carl@xena.IPAustralia.gov.au, freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: not really related to but triggered from Re: (again) panic: vinvalbuf: dirty bufs Message-ID: <199905282308.QAA14638@salsa.gv.tsc.tdk.com> In-Reply-To: David Wolfskill <dhw@whistle.com> "Re: not really related to but triggered from Re: (again) panic: vinvalbuf: dirty bufs" (May 28, 7:18am)
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On May 28, 7:18am, David Wolfskill wrote: } Subject: Re: not really related to but triggered from Re: (again) panic: v } >Date: Fri, 28 May 1999 13:02:50 +1000 (EST) } >From: Carl Makin <carl@xena.IPAustralia.gov.au> } } >> ffs_mountfs: superblock updated for soft updates } } >Is it possible for this message to include *what* filesystem was update } >for soft updates? } } I mentioned this to Julian a while back; as I understand it, at the time } the message is issued, the requisite information is not available to be } included. What about fs_fsmnt[]? To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199905282308.QAA14638>