Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2012 12:50:02 -0500 From: Adam Vande More <amvandemore@gmail.com> To: Roman Divacky <rdivacky@freebsd.org> Cc: toolchain@freebsd.org, Tijl Coosemans <tijl@coosemans.org>, Dimitry Andric <dim@freebsd.org>, current@freebsd.org, Steve Kargl <sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> Subject: Re: Clang as default compiler November 4th Message-ID: <CA%2BtpaK2ozzDKfUtjBzjttjqcK9CCLpy0sWNakk7x6qDxdvmfvA@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <20120911171948.GA81334@freebsd.org> References: <20120910211207.GC64920@lor.one-eyed-alien.net> <20120911104518.GF37286@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua> <20120911120649.GA52235@freebsd.org> <20120911132410.GA87126@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> <504F4645.4070900@FreeBSD.org> <504F4A6B.4010001@coosemans.org> <20120911151230.GB87526@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> <20120911171948.GA81334@freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 12:19 PM, Roman Divacky <rdivacky@freebsd.org>wrote: > > Can you please provide a small self contained test case that shows > that clang is doing worse on accuracy than gcc? > > So that we can analyze it and decide if it's a bug in the code or > in the compiler. So far we know absolutely nothing. > Not to speak for Steve, but he provided this information in another thread: http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current/2012-September/036410.html -- Adam Vande More
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CA%2BtpaK2ozzDKfUtjBzjttjqcK9CCLpy0sWNakk7x6qDxdvmfvA>