Date: Wed, 5 Oct 2005 15:01:38 +0400 (MSD) From: .@babolo.ru To: "Dave+Seddon" <dave-dated-1128917317.27d977@seddon.ca> Cc: 'Benjamin Rosenblum' <ben@benswebs.com>, Darren Pilgrim <dmp@bitfreak.org>, net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Which em(4) chips work/don't work? [Was: RE: dummynet, em driver, device polling issues :-((] Message-ID: <1128510098.391180.8753.nullmailer@cicuta.babolo.ru> In-Reply-To: <1128485315.80787.TMDA@seddon.ca>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
[ Charset UTF-8 unsupported, converting... ] > > Would an official person care to chime in about putting together a card/chip > > vs. em(4) bugs matrix? No sense, because bugs depend not on/only card/chip, but at least load. In my expierence quality of em interface depends on quantity of ipfw rules, pipes and on traffic load.home | help
Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1128510098.391180.8753.nullmailer>